1 inch = 2.54 centimetres (exact).To convert inches to centimetres, multiply by 2.54 — the exact definition since the 1959 International Yard and Pound Agreement.
Quick Values
Formula
Centimeters = Inches × 2.54
Quick reference table
| Inches | Centimetres |
|---|---|
| 1 in | 2.54 cm |
| 2 in | 5.08 cm |
| 5 in | 12.70 cm |
| 10 in | 25.40 cm |
| 12 in | 30.48 cm |
| 24 in | 60.96 cm |
| 36 in | 91.44 cm |
| 48 in | 121.92 cm |
| 60 in | 152.40 cm |
| 72 in | 182.88 cm |
| 100 in | 254.00 cm |
| 120 in | 304.80 cm |
How to Convert Inches to Cm
- Enter the length in inches.Type the length in inches (decimals or fractions).
- See the centimeters.The equivalent in centimeters appears instantly.
Inches to Centimeters Converter
Type any length in inches — TV diagonal from a US-spec catalogue, monitor size, paper width, picture frame opening, screwdriver shaft, US recipe pan — and the page renders the equivalent in centimeters underneath at four-decimal precision. Useful when buying a US-imported electronic device with imperial measurements, fitting an American-spec piece of furniture into a metric room, comparing monitor sizes across catalogues that mix systems, or sanity-checking that a US shipping carton's dimensions fit your metric storage shelves.
About this tool
The conversion uses the international yard and pound agreement of 1959: 1 inch = 2.54 cm exactly. The factor is defined, not measured — it's the same number across NIST SP 811:2008, the UK Weights and Measures Act 1985, and ISO 80000-3:2019 (current Quantities and Units Part 3, revising ISO 80000-3:2006, which superseded ISO 31-1). Common reference points: 1 in = 2.54 cm, 6 in = 15.24 cm, 12 in (1 foot) = 30.48 cm, 36 in (1 yard) = 91.44 cm, 24 in TV = 60.96 cm diagonal, 27 in monitor = 68.58 cm, 32 in TV = 81.28 cm, 55 in TV = 139.7 cm, 65 in TV = 165.1 cm, US Letter paper (8.5 × 11 in) = 21.59 × 27.94 cm. Body-related references: a 5'10" person is 70 in = 177.8 cm, a 6 ft person is 182.88 cm, a US Men's size 9 foot length on the Brannock scale is 10.333 in ≈ 26.25 cm. For converting a feet+inches measurement, multiply feet by 12 then add the inches before passing it in (5 ft 10 in → 70 in → 177.8 cm).
- Exact SI factor 1 inch = 2.54 cm (defined, not measured)
- Live conversion as you type — no Convert button
- 4-decimal-place precision (more than enough for any retail spec)
- Swap button to flip to the reverse cm-to-inches page
- Copy result as "X inches = Y cm" with a single click
- Accepts fractional inches as decimals (e.g. 5.75 in for 5¾")
- Quick presets for common lengths (TV sizes, paper, monitor sizes)
- No upload — every conversion runs locally in your browser
- Useful for US display catalogues, imported furniture, US shipping cartons, height
- Reference: 12 in = 30.48 cm (1 ft) · 27 in monitor = 68.58 cm · 5'10" = 177.8 cm
Free. No signup. Your inputs stay in your browser. Ads via Google AdSense (consent required).
Frequently asked questions
What's the difference between Survey Foot and International Foot post-2022?
Two definitions of "foot" coexisted in the United States from 1959 to 2022. The international foot (0.3048 m exactly, established by the 1959 IYPA) is the definition used by NIST, science, engineering, and consumer measurements. The U.S. survey foot (1200/3937 m ≈ 0.30480061 m) was a legacy unit retained for state-plane coordinate land surveying; it is about 2 ppm longer than the international foot — over a 100-mile baseline that drifts by ~1.06 ft. NIST and NOAA jointly announced in October 2019 that the survey foot would be deprecated, and on 31 December 2022 the deprecation took effect: from 1 January 2023 the international foot is the sole official foot in the United States for all new surveying. State plane coordinate systems are migrating to metres or to the international foot. For consumer inch-to-cm conversion the distinction is irrelevant — both definitions agree on the inch to within parts per million.
How do I convert a US shoe size to centimetres?
The Brannock Device — designed by Charles Brannock in Syracuse, NY (original patent filed December 1925, granted 1928 as US Patent 1,682,366; commercialised through The Brannock Device Company, founded 1927) — defines the American consumer shoe-sizing scale. US Men's size 1 corresponds to a foot length of 7⅔ in (7.667 in); each subsequent size is ⅓ in longer. The general formula is length-in-inches = (size + 22)/3 for Men's. So a US Men's size 9 measures (9+22)/3 = 10.333 in, which converts to 10.333 × 2.54 = 26.25 cm. US Women's starts at 7⅓ in (7.333 in, equivalent to Men's size 0) with the same ⅓-in step. Note that this is the foot length used by the device, not the shoe outer length — actual shoes are typically 1-1.5 cm longer than the foot itself for fit. EU sizes use the Paris point (⅔ cm = 6.667 mm per size), which is why the size numbers are larger.
Why are US Letter and A4 close but not equal?
They come from incompatible design conventions. ISO 216:2007 specifies the A series (A0 = 1 m² area; A4 = 210 × 297 mm exact) such that each fold preserves the same √2 aspect ratio — a property the US system lacks. US Letter (8.5 × 11 in = 21.59 × 27.94 cm) has its origin in the 19th-century US paper trade; ANSI/ASME Y14.1 codifies it as the ANSI A engineering drawing sheet size. A4 is therefore 0.59 cm narrower and 1.76 cm taller than US Letter; printing a Letter-formatted PDF at A4 size with shrink-to-fit typically scales to ~97.3% (the width-limiting ratio), leaving margin at the bottom. Most office software ships A4 default in EU locales and Letter in US locales.
Do tire markings like "265/70 R17" mix inches and millimetres?
Yes. The first number is the section width in millimetres (265 mm here = 26.5 cm); the second is the aspect ratio expressed as a percent (sidewall height ÷ section width × 100, so 70% of 265 mm = 185.5 mm ≈ 7.3 in sidewall height); R denotes radial construction; the trailing number is the rim diameter in inches (17 in = 43.18 cm). The split predates global metrication: wheel rims were standardised by inch fractions before tire section widths converged on millimetres, and the existing industry practice was codified rather than refactored. To estimate overall tire outside diameter from "265/70 R17": 17 in + 2 × 7.3 in = 31.6 in ≈ 80.3 cm.
Why is a "2×4" lumber piece actually 1.5 × 3.5 in?
US dimensional lumber is sold by nominal size — the dimensions of the rough-sawn green board before drying and surface dressing. The American Softwood Lumber Standard (Voluntary Product Standard PS 20-20, published by NIST and the American Lumber Standard Committee) defines the actual finished dimensions. A 2×4 starts at 2 × 4 in rough; after drying (which shrinks the wood) and dressing on four sides ("S4S") it ends at 1½ × 3½ in (3.81 × 8.89 cm). Similarly a 1×6 finishes at ¾ × 5½ in, a 2×6 at 1½ × 5½ in. This matters when designing a frame in metric: if you specify a 38 mm × 89 mm framing member, US carpentry will recognise that as a 2×4. The rule does not apply to plywood (sold in actual dimensions, e.g. 1220 × 2440 mm = 4 × 8 ft) or to specialty timber sold S2S (dressed two sides only).
Sources (9)
- U.S. National Bureau of Standards (1959). Refinement of Values for the Yard and the Pound — International Yard and Pound Agreement (1 inch = exactly 2.54 cm = 25.4 mm; 1 foot = exactly 30.48 cm; 1 yard = exactly 0.9144 m). Federal Register Doc 59-5442, published 30 June 1959, effective 1 July 1959 (joint declaration with the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and South Africa).
- International Organization for Standardization (2019). ISO 80000-3:2019 — Quantities and units, Part 3: Space and time (current edition; revises ISO 80000-3:2006, which superseded ISO 31-1). ISO Technical Committee 12 (TC 12 — Quantities and units).
- Thompson, A., & Taylor, B. N. (2008). Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) — NIST Special Publication 811, 2008 edition. U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD — physics.nist.gov/cuu/pdf/sp811.pdf.
- NIST & NOAA (2022). Deprecation of the U.S. Survey Foot — international foot (1 ft = exactly 0.3048 m) supersedes the U.S. survey foot (1200/3937 m ≈ 0.30480061 m) effective 31 December 2022; legacy support retained for State Plane Coordinate Systems of 1983 and 1927. Federal Register notice 85 FR 62698, published 5 October 2020; transition coordinated by NIST and NOAA's National Geodetic Survey.
- UK Parliament (1985). Weights and Measures Act 1985, Schedule 1 — yard defined as 0.9144 m and pound as 0.45359237 kg, aligning the United Kingdom with the 1959 International Yard and Pound Agreement. UK statute (legislation.gov.uk).
- Brannock, C. F. / The Brannock Device Company (1927). U.S. shoe-sizing standard — Men's size 1 = 7⅔ in (7.667 in), each subsequent size +⅓ in; Women's size 1 = 7⅓ in (7.333 in, equivalent to Men's size 0), +⅓ in per size; widths separated by 3/16 in. Charles F. Brannock (Syracuse, NY) filed his original patent in December 1925, granted 1928 (US Patent 1,682,366). The Brannock Device Company, Syracuse, NY (incorporated 1927); the device became the de facto US footwear sizing standard.
- International Organization for Standardization (2007). ISO 216:2007 — Writing paper and certain classes of printed matter — Trimmed sizes — A and B series (A0 = 1 m² area; A4 = 210 × 297 mm exact; √2 aspect ratio preserved across folds). ISO Technical Committee 6 (TC 6 — Paper, board and pulps); the US Letter (8.5 × 11 in = 21.59 × 27.94 cm) and Legal sizes are governed separately by ANSI/ASME Y14.1.
- American Lumber Standard Committee (ALSC) / NIST (2020). Voluntary Product Standard PS 20-20 — American Softwood Lumber Standard, defines nominal vs actual dimensions for dressed dimensional lumber: 2×4 nominal = 1½ × 3½ in (38 × 89 mm) actual after drying and surfacing on four sides (S4S); 2×6 = 1½ × 5½ in; 1×6 = ¾ × 5½ in. Voluntary Product Standard PS 20-20 (NIST and ALSC, 2020 edition); applies to softwood lumber sold in the United States.
- World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (2018). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 — Success Criterion 4.1.3 Status Messages. W3C Recommendation 5 June 2018; carried unchanged into WCAG 2.2 (Recommendation 5 October 2023).
These are the original publications the formulas in this tool are based on. Locate them by journal name and year on Google Scholar or PubMed.
By Marco B. ·