1 centimetre = 0.3937 inches.To convert cm to inches, multiply by 0.3937 (or divide by 2.54 — the exact definition since the 1959 International Yard and Pound Agreement).
Quick Values
Formula
Inches = Centimeters × 0.393701
Quick reference table
| Centimetres | Inches |
|---|---|
| 1 cm | 0.3937 in |
| 2.54 cm | 1 in |
| 5 cm | 1.9685 in |
| 10 cm | 3.9370 in |
| 15 cm | 5.9055 in |
| 30 cm | 11.8110 in |
| 50 cm | 19.6850 in |
| 100 cm | 39.3701 in |
| 152 cm | 59.8425 in |
| 170 cm | 66.9291 in |
| 183 cm | 72.0472 in |
| 200 cm | 78.7402 in |
How to Convert Cm to Inches
- Enter the length in cm.Type the length in centimeters.
- See the inches.The equivalent in inches appears instantly, shown as decimal and fraction.
Centimeters to Inches Converter
Type any length in centimeters — TV diagonal from a metric retailer, height from your passport, monitor size, picture frame opening, package dimensions for international shipping — and the page renders the equivalent in inches underneath at six-decimal precision. Useful when comparing display sizes from US-spec catalogues with European ones, communicating your height to American friends, sanity-checking a furniture spec from a metric source against an imperial doorway, or filling in international shipping forms that demand inch dimensions.
About this tool
The conversion uses the international yard and pound agreement of 1959: 1 inch = 2.54 cm exactly, which makes 1 cm = 1/2.54 ≈ 0.3937007874 inches. This is a defined relationship — there's no measurement error in the underlying constant, only in the rounded output (six decimals here, 12+ in the unrounded internal calculation). The same factor is enshrined in NIST SP 811:2008 (Thompson & Taylor) in the US, BS 350:2004 in the UK, and ISO 80000-3:2019 internationally. Common reference points: 1 cm = 0.394 in, 10 cm = 3.937 in, 30 cm = 11.811 in (≈ 1 foot), 100 cm = 39.370 in, 170 cm = 66.929 in (≈ 5'7"), 180 cm = 70.866 in (≈ 5'11"), 250 cm = 98.425 in (≈ 8'2"), and 25.4 cm = 10 in is exact by definition. For converting a cm height into feet+inches use the result divided by 12 — 170 cm → 66.929 in → 5 ft + 6.929 in.
- Exact SI factor 1 inch = 2.54 cm (so 1 cm = 0.3937007874 in)
- Live conversion as you type — no Convert button
- 6-decimal-place precision for engineering-grade accuracy
- Swap button to flip to the reverse inches-to-cm page
- Copy result as "X cm = Y inches" with a single click
- Accepts decimal cm input including negative for relative measurements
- Quick presets for common lengths (TV sizes, paper, body height)
- No upload — every conversion runs locally in your browser
- Useful for international shipping forms, US/EU display catalogues, body height comms
- Reference: 30 cm ≈ 1 ft · 100 cm = 39.37 in · 170 cm ≈ 5'7"
Free. No signup. Your inputs stay in your browser. Ads via Google AdSense (consent required).
Frequently asked questions
Why is "1 inch = 2.54 cm" exact and not measured?
The 1959 International Yard and Pound Agreement (Federal Register Doc 59-5442, published 30 June 1959 and effective 1 July 1959) defined the yard as exactly 0.9144 metres for six countries — the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa. Dividing by 36 inches per yard yields 0.0254 m = 25.4 mm = 2.54 cm per inch, exact by definition. Before 1959 each country had its own yard prototype with small mutual differences at parts-per-million scale; the agreement froze the relationship to make engineering and trade calibration interoperable across the six signatory nations. For everyday cm-to-inch conversion this means there is no measurement uncertainty in the constant — only in the rounding of the displayed result.
Does rounding to 4 vs 6 decimals matter for my project?
For consumer-grade use (TV diagonals, body height, package dimensions, picture frames) four decimal places of inches are well below the precision the underlying source measurement carries — a TV diagonal is itself spec-rounded to the nearest tenth of an inch by the manufacturer, so 4 dp output (~25 µm of resolution) is already an order of magnitude finer than the input. For engineering drawings specified in metric whose inch translation will be re-machined on CNC equipment, six decimals preserves micrometre-scale precision. The internal calculation uses full IEEE-754 double precision (15–17 significant decimals); the displayed six is a deliberate rounding that avoids the false precision of "0.39370078740157480315 in" that no real-world dimension actually has.
Why is a "32-inch TV" sometimes 31.5 in actual diagonal?
TV manufacturers label products in "class" sizes — round numbers like 32, 43, 55, 65 — that approximate but do not always equal the measured diagonal. Industry practice (descended from the original 1966 FTC Picture Tube Rule, repealed October 2018) plus general truth-in-advertising principles place the actual diagonal on the spec sheet, even when the box and marketing copy use the rounded class number. A product called "32-inch" typically lists an actual diagonal slightly under 32 in on the spec sheet — often around 31.5 in (≈ 80.0 cm); a "55-inch" label commonly maps to roughly 54.6 in (≈ 138.7 cm) of measured diagonal. When converting cm to inches to compare a European catalogue against a US one, look at the spec-sheet diagonal, not the class size on the box.
How do I express a cm height as "5 ft 10 in" form?
Convert cm to total inches (170 cm × 1/2.54 = 66.929 in), divide by 12 to split feet and remainder (66.929 ÷ 12 = 5 with remainder 6.929 in), and the answer is 5 ft 6.929 in — usually written 5'7" after rounding to the nearest inch. The page output is total inches; the feet+inches form is a derived display. Common heights for reference: 160 cm = 5'2.99" → 5'3"; 170 cm = 5'6.93" → 5'7"; 180 cm = 5'10.87" → 5'11"; 190 cm = 6'2.80" → 6'3". US passport, driver's license and USCIS immigration forms ask for height in feet+inches; converting from a passport that reads "1.78 m" to "5'10\"" is the most common consumer use case.
Why do mental shortcuts like "1 cm ≈ 0.4 in" produce errors over long lengths?
The exact factor is 0.39370 in/cm; the popular shortcut 0.4 overstates each centimetre by 0.00630 in (~1.6%). On a 30 cm cabinet cut that compounds to 0.189 in ≈ 4.8 mm — the difference between fitting and not fitting in the slot. For sub-metre lengths the absolute drift is small but linear (a 10 cm strip is off by 1.6 mm; a 20 cm one by 3.2 mm); for anything dimensional that needs to mate (door frames, cabinet runs, monitor stands, picture frames) prefer a calculated 4-decimal value over a mental approximation. The trap applies in reverse too: "1 in ≈ 2.5 cm" understates by 0.04 cm/in, which over a yard-long piece (36 in) drifts by 1.44 cm.
Sources (5)
- U.S. National Bureau of Standards (1959). Refinement of Values for the Yard and the Pound — International Yard and Pound Agreement (1 yd = exactly 0.9144 m → 1 inch = exactly 25.4 mm = 2.54 cm; reciprocal 1 cm = 1/2.54 = 0.39370078740157480… in, non-terminating in decimal but exact in rational form). Federal Register Doc 59-5442, published 30 June 1959, effective 1 July 1959 (joint declaration with the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and South Africa).
- International Organization for Standardization (2019). ISO 80000-3:2019 — Quantities and units, Part 3: Space and time (current edition; revises ISO 80000-3:2006, which itself superseded ISO 31-1). ISO Technical Committee 12 (TC 12 — Quantities and units).
- Thompson, A., & Taylor, B. N. (2008). Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) — NIST Special Publication 811, 2008 edition (supersedes the 1995 edition; SI redefinition updates of 2019 are reflected separately in NIST SP 330 9th edition). U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD — physics.nist.gov/cuu/pdf/sp811.pdf.
- British Standards Institution (BSI) (2004). BS 350:2004 — Conversion factors for units (engineering, industry, and trade conversion factors). BSI Knowledge, London — current edition; supersedes BS 350-1:1974 and BS 350-2:1962.
- World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (2018). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 — Success Criterion 4.1.3 Status Messages. W3C Recommendation 5 June 2018; carried unchanged into WCAG 2.2 (Recommendation 5 October 2023).
These are the original publications the formulas in this tool are based on. Locate them by journal name and year on Google Scholar or PubMed.
By Marco B. ·